Is k/d ratio or total kills better?

[Raze!]

Originally Posted by Resistance

Stop spamming you douche.

LOL!!! LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lololololol

Wait is this spamming??

anyway see what you mean you get more kills on Ground war but S&D is more stealth
and you easily get more kills then deaths but yes to get more kills then go on ground war.

[a.m.g]

Originally Posted by Raze!

LOL!!! LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lololololol

Wait is this spamming??

anyway see what you mean you get more kills on Ground war but S&D is more stealth
and you easily get more kills then deaths but yes to get more kills then go on ground war.

Not really. If your lucky youll get 3-4 kills a match, which takes 2+ mins long. Even then, you might get killed at the beginning. Whereas Ground War your bound to get at least 10 kills in 3-4 mins if you dont suck

[Rbentley100]

ground war/team, death match ffa and things are far easier to get a decent k/d ratio on than S&D. and also you get 5-10times as many kills. Iv found if I ever play these game types there are 1 or 2 people who vaguely know what they are doing and then just alot of cannon fodder for them

[bubBleGum]

kill death is way better man.. oviously u dont go and play 2 games and get like 40 kills and 10 deaths and go around all happy and shit saying u got a 4.0 k/d ratio... u still need mad kills... so i guess wat im saying is u need both lol

[Resistance]

Originally Posted by a.m.g

Not really. If your lucky youll get 3-4 kills a match, which takes 2+ mins long. Even then, you might get killed at the beginning. Whereas Ground War your bound to get at least 10 kills in 3-4 mins if you dont suck

Maybe you only get 3-4 kills a match but not everyone sucks. And each round is 2 minutes each, not the whole match.

In other words, that post was probably one of the most useless posts I've ever read.

[jmass222]

win to lose ratio is the best

[Quagmire]

Defo K/D ratio. You could have 100,000 kills and 1,000,000 deaths, and thats not good